The Power of Indonesian Twitterers

Indonesian former President GusDur just passed away, and the news is going through the web like a knife through hot butter.
Twitter is NOT a localized service, but THIS is what happens when Indonesian people carry a buzz:


















Indonesian community is often overlooked when it comes to web and IT, but the technology gap is rapidly filling up, and we'll probably be in for a surprise during the next couple of years.

Gitu aja kok repot toh twitter? ;) Rest in peace, Mr. GusDur.

Update, 20.30

















Follow me on Twitter

Could Google be the big loser of 2010?

Here are some of my views, again, about Google and its possible future, and no, they are not 'good guys'.

  • Google has become a quasi monopolistic instance on the internet
  • The FCC has noticed it and they are now thinking about 'search neutrality'
  • No, Google are not such good guys, neither that innovative, and tend to buy everything they can to crush the concurrence, or to bypass their search own algorithms to promote their products
  • Not only the FCC has noticed that, but some devs are getting worried too
  • Their relevance is less and less a fact, and they might be outsmarted by social networking websites
  • Not long until a broader public notices it
  • Still, going open would clean all this mess


If you've had the luck to spend some of you bits of boredom reading this blog, you probably know that I like to follow Google's strategies and evolution. You also probably know it somewhat worries me, even if I'm still enthused by their product.

It's too bad I'm publishing this post now, since everybody is busy with end-of-the-year-festivities and nobody will notice the fabulous article I am linking here: Search, but You May Not Find (nytimes.com)

It's all about search neutrality, or how Google, Yahoo and Bing are now "the gatekeepers of the internet". How it can unbalance the market and how someone should do something about it.

It begins on this cheerful note (bold is mine):

The need for search neutrality is particularly pressing because so much market power lies in the hands of one company: Google. With 71 percent of the United States search market (and 90 percent in Britain), Google’s dominance of both search and search advertising gives it overwhelming control. Google’s revenues exceeded $21 billion last year, but this pales next to the hundreds of billions of dollars of other companies’ revenues that Google controls indirectly through its search results and sponsored links.

Ok, until now nothing really new, we already know Google is very big. The sponsored links and search result part is maybe a bit less obvious, since many users are now tending to think that Google is the Internet. Think about it, not only G (I'll call it G yes, I feel lazy tonight) has contributed to create some huge fortunes, but there is now a whole market of SEO consulting and optimization entirely centered on them. Frightening bit, when you think about the metric cartload of so called "SEO specialist", Black Hat SEO pseudo hackers, content and link farms gravitating around it. G has an enormous influence on the economy both above and underground, and if you're in IT, you probably owe it your job, a way or another.

Ok, this bit is secured, pretty glad it was obvious.Next:

Another way that Google exploits its control is through preferential placement [..]promoting its own services at or near the top of its search results, bypassing the algorithms it uses to rank the services of others[...] Wherever it does so, incumbents are toppled, new entrants are suppressed and innovation is imperiled.[...]Some will argue that Google is itself so innovative that we needn’t worry. But the company isn’t as innovative as it is regularly given credit for[...]Google’s meteoric success, are essentially borrowed inventions: Google acquired AdSense by purchasing Applied Semantics in 2003; and AdWords, though developed by Google, is used under license from its inventors, Overture.

NICE TO KNOW! And nice to know I'm not a lunatic, the whole article make me feel I'm not alone, and this bit precisely, makes me feel that I'm right to worry.
That's one thing if Google is what it pretends to be, (that is: an open and innovative search engine pushing everyday the limits of information gathering and usability), and another thing altogether when it appears that the G is a buy-and-squash machine, intending to become the one vortex to any info hosted,shared, advertised or created on the web, from anywhere.

You can perfectly react thinking that, after all, they are offering a free service and no company should rely on free services (yeahright), that after all, they have the right to advertise their own product (it's not like they were, say, Microsoft and bundling, say, a browser with their operating system). And well, if people are so worried, people shall build their own monopolistic search engine.

Thinking like that would be logical, but no thank you. Be it with OS, Telecoms or search engines, monopole is bad.

From this point, how is the future branching?

G's core functionality is slowly but surely losing its appeal, losing relevance everyday while being submerged by content/link farms, domain parkers ands the likes. Users are more and more accustomed to seek information through social networking rather than organic search. Online marketers are aware of that.
Big Daddy G has also proven to be hungry enough to worry the FCC, that's almost an epiphany.
Until now, all they needed to do in order to prove the 'purity' of their policies was to hurl widgets at the crowd while screaming "We are no evil!". FCC is bad publicity, they will have to work harder.
If nothing is done, they could leave the lead to other runner-ups such as Cuil and "the word of the fingers". Worse, some developers are being seriously annoyed by their API policy and the word could spread pretty fast, leaving them without another major source of innovation.
See by yourself (readwriteweb.com and totlol.com)

Google releases a public API. They watch what third-party developers do with the API and modify the Terms of Service (ToS) for that API in a way that prevents breakthrough potential. Google may then move to offer a similar service based on their platform rather than the API.
That, dear sir, is a pissed-off developer talking from experience.

In order to regain the relevance they build their reputation upon, going social would be a great idea. It would also, if the FCC rules out for a search neutrality regulation, reinforce the hegemony driven image they are starting to acquire.

What they could do though, to get rid of any suspicions and confirm their good will toward the users and the Quality Of The Interwebs, is to go 100% open, even if they don't really seem to like the idea.

Year 2010 will be interesting. Wait and see.





Follow me on Twitter

E-Books readers: Potential tool for the Thought Police.

This Christmas, Amazon have been selling more kindle than physical books.

For those who still don't know the kindle is an e-book reader, you can access to an online library and download your e-books, and do everything you'd to usually except maybe reading in the bath.
I hate the product, deeply, due to very shady terms of use, I've blogged about it before.

It kills me to know that while privacy is becoming a major topic, which will probably be buzzing all around the web in 2010, people still fall for a device that spies on everything you read.

According to the chart on eff.org, the Kindle is not the only guilty one here, Google Books and the BnB Nook are also sharing information about your readings... to third party service providers.

Who are the third party service providers? I just wish it's not a potential future Independent Bureau Of Thought Correctness...

Well, just wait, see, and hope New Moon is never made illegal.


Follow me on Twitter

Non-Latin hassle in your URLs starting for 2010

Starting from 2010, domain names will be able to contain non-Latin characters, such a HOBЫЙyЧеНЫЙ.pф. Real joy to type.

I'll make it short first if you don't have time to read everything:

  • Languages are a major barrier in communication
  • You shouldn't fragment the web more than it already is
  • Non-Latin characters are a pain in the neck to type
  • If there is a shortage of URLs, why not adding domain types like .portal, .cloud, .blog ?

That initiative is... probably not a good one.

Yesterday, alone in my little room, I caught myself thinking of how it would be shall we come in contact with an evolved specie not using oral or written communication. Of course this specie would be transient and every unit would act as the whole... if you read science fiction you've probably read things like that before...

The point is, the more I thought about it and the more I thought that the language barrier is one of the most serious hindrances when it comes to communication. That specie would be baffled by the difficulties we have to overcome in order to deliver a clear message.
How can you even go as far as "Please explain me" when you don't even know how to say or write it?
Today, when someone can fluently speak more than one language, this person is considered gifted. Being one of those lucky speakers, I can assure you that one more language in your pocket can give you an infinity of new possibilities.

The interwebz is a place where knowledge (at least information... at least noise) is supposed to be global, or at least tends to be so. The standards on which it's built are one of the leading factors, but the predominance of only a couple of languages worldwide (not only for the web) is another. But finding non-Latin content is still tricky.

Now let say I want to look for the lyrics of a Russian song I really like. Russian doesn't have yet a standardized transliteration, as far as I know, and making a search with Latin alphabet will get pretty hard, considering that I've seen 'good' transliterated as 'horoshe' 'harasho' 'harosho' and so on and so forth. I've done it before and I usually have to try and fail several time, waiting for a Cyrillic version to come up the search results, copy and paste in the search field and find my way in. Of course my Russian is far from fluent, and it takes me ages to get what I want.

This is just a small example, and well, when doing so I'm really getting what I'm asking for.
But what about real knowledge/technical sharing? Have you ever operated a Mandarin or Russian version of Windows? Do you know how much of a pain it is? Do you really want to extend this pain to the web?

I don't. I don't want to have to remember a Cyrillic url, or worse, a traditional Chinese one, I can't even type it!

If you're short on URLs, all the domain names being virtually all taken or parked, well, extend the domain types.
I would rather have to deal with danny-fr.perso.fr or tsugoidane.portal.jp than großebusiness.de
(and I had to open a FAQ to type the ß, I'm typing from a mac and don't have my dear charmap)

Follow me on Twitter

Could Google become 100% open?

Google have spoken about openness. Basically they agree to be open as long as it's not about their search algorithm or their secret back end. Makes sense.
After having read this article at The Register, one thought is slowly forming on the top of my head.

As I have been writing somewhere earlier, Google tends to become the favorite toy in the hands of links/content farms, and I have to insist on the fact that I'm actually using it less and less when it comes to searching.

Google's main argument about not opening their sources is that it would give key information to black hats and spammer to manipulate their algorithm and bias the search rankings.
Another argument is that they simply don't want to give away the product of ten years of hard labor.

What could actually happen if Google DID go full open?
Probably both argument would turn out to be true, but in the end I tend to think that it would enhance user's browsing experience, simply because once an algorithm is supported by a whole open source community, it benefits from the smarts of hundreds more people. Yes black hats would go at it, but fixes would eventually come and anyway in case you didn't notice, spammer are ALREADY at it.

Now, in a context where users tend to rediscover to power of social interaction, and where the word of the fingers is slowly replacing the world of the mouth, search engine might quickly become a 2nd or 3rd grade facility if they don't find a way to adapt this current change of trend.

Would they actually take the dare?
Maybe. I don't think their current attempt at becoming the internet's major hub will benefit any freezing of their policies after the launch of Chrome OS. They will by then be everywhere, and do mostly everything, and they will need to keep up the good work, harder than ever before... what's better than some hundreds/thousands extra heads for that?

Follow me on Twitter

The Global Bigotry

Here is a long post, so I'll get to the bullets:

  • People worry about online privacy
  • Social media profiling could cost you your job for a nice week end bender
  • Social media profiling could cost you your job for things you'd thing completely normal
  • The law should grant online privacy the same status as IRL privacy
  • The creation of a unique online ID could help

Few days after facebook changed its privacy policy, I've seen various reactions around the web and outside. When some people don't really care, some other are concerned enough to write "Is Social Media Privacy an Oxymoron?"

I've read it twice. And if I agree with some of what's written, I must say that the tone is much too optimistic to my taste.

I never had a tattoo, facial piercing or crazy haircut knowing that these would be a no-no for any future job seeking.
Nonetheless I like playing with my appearance. Every now and then I make silly faces, I dress up or I take cheesy poses, Rarely, very very rarely I drink myself silly (doesn't take much effort, I can't drink). Also, I don't chose my friends for their social status or their political inclinations, and I don't feel ashamed of being seen with them. I have many female friends, just friends, and sometimes we hug, and gay friends, and sometimes we hug too.

Two keywords when it comes to social media: fun and common sense. Have plenty of both.


That's where the problem is. Where does common sense and fun begin and when do they end to leave only downright shameful moments?

See this scenario:

On Friday night, I've had a terrible week and my mood belly flopping on a historical low, a friend of mine invites me to a quiet cafe to have a drink. Then, well, you know how it goes, and we end up in a much less reputable cafe, I've had my 3 beers (enough to make me really drunk) and I'm pole dancing with a girl I don't know and her gay buddy.
It's my absolute right.
Flashy flashy, a picture is taken and tagged on Facebook.
I sleep all the week end, not only because of the party but also because of my 70 work ours of last week, and on Monday I'm the freshest to go to work.
Mister Big Boss asks me in his office, he's seen my pics, he doesn't like drunk bent pole dancing.I slept, I didn't un-tag my pic, Ooops.


What's wrong in this case is the fact that I have the right to do whatever I want outside working hours, and that my private life belongs to me only. As long as I'm not breaking the law, sorry Boss, but you have no rights. Or you shouldn't have.

This scenario is already disturbing. But it could be worse.

See this one:

On a workday, I'll spend my evening with my best female friend, her gay friend, in a gay bar. The evening will be spent drinking juice, making silly jokes, and I'll tenderly hug my female friend and bear hug my gay friend as a good bye. Clickety clickety, photos, Facebook. I don't see why I should remove them.
The day after, job interview.
Tough luck, the HR person is secretly homophobic, and no, the HR person doesn't like my silly faces, and anyway I'm hugging that person who's not my wife, I am probably a heathen fornicator. No job for me.

That's where it becomes truly dangerous.

Laws have been created to make the office a place where people should work without having to be worried by their sexual/political/entertainment-al preferences. It's not always the case, but I don't think that, until now, any HR would ask you "Was this person you hugged your brother or are you gay? Was this woman you hugged your wife? Will you be so exuberant in you cubicle?". Mainly because it's probably not common practice yet, but also because they wouldn't have any pretext to ask.

In the first example, I haven't even uploaded the pics myself, a friend with lousy privacy settings did. In the second example, I uploaded pics seemingly harmless, and in both case, damn, it's my life there, I'm allowed, by law, to do these kind of things.

Fun and Common Sense are two concepts too often missing in some people, and lest we are careful we might see the rise of a dangerous kind of internet bigotry.

What to do then?

Simply forbid people you don't want nosing in your stuff from accessing your online personal data, the same way they can't enter your room and look for your stash of hidden pr0n.

A unique, legal and standardized online identity, granting legally you the same privacy right as in real life should take care of that.

Let's root for it, wait, and see.



Follow me on Twitter

Google Wave, Twitter Killer

I finally got an invite to Google Wave.

You'd figure that such a busy internet body as myself would get it at once, but well, sometimes I'm just slow.

But there are two things I've seen in Google wave.
The wave is going to wash twitter away, and turn Google social, in the blink of an eye.

As I explain in my last post, the web is getting crowed and users tend to seek information as they would do IRL, that is, asking their friends, and their friend's friends, trying to do their best to organize and and skim the flow.
Twitter is still booming because it's the first tool allowing users to freely share any bit of information without further ado, but users will soon have to face the information overflow and the sharing limitations, then realize that they need something a notch higher.

What Twitter lacks (length, attachments, organized replies and so on...), Google Wave has it all, in real time, as easy as a drag and drop to upload your file.
What we call a "tweet" today, they call it a wave, and it's an entire conversation, manageable and editable, including as many members as you want, and yes, sharable, and yes tagg-able, and yes search-able and whatever-else-able with extensions and widgets.

And oh so much more noise. But we all like noise don't we? And you can edit comments almost anonymously, right, and you can't search for people not in your contact list, right?
And Google is not gonna let it happen in the final version...right?

But then again, I could be wrong. Wait and see.


Follow me on Twitter

Irrelevent content and social habits.

"Google it, you idiot!"

How often have you heard more or less polite version of this sentence?
That's clear enough, if you are looking for something, just search for it using google, and you're sure to find heaven and its rivers of milk.

Or not.

One of the most blatant example I can find is the dishwasher search, that will lead you to the infamous about.com and provide you with a short, uninteresting and irrelevant short article about the dishwasher's inventor.

Try any search with 'best' as a keyword, and you'll realize that there are jazilions of review websites out there waiting to bait you with their "10 best" "20 best" and "1589635 best" lists.

These results are rendered possible by the convergence of two technologies: Google PageRanks and content farms. The web is becoming crowded with irrelevent, cheap content, written only in order to make you click on a bunch of adds.

Now, what motivates me to write as-relevant-as-possible articles in this blog is nothing but my interest for the IT world and my hyperactivity. Since I need to get some input to produce my fantastic analysis, I need reliable sources, or at least seemingly reliable. Stuff that make sense.
How do I get it?
I know about website A, in which John.D, from website B commented. Therefore I will pay a visit to website B and see what I can get from there... following my gentle web-walk, I will notice the interesting content, subsicribe to the RSS, follow it on Twitter, and my source DB will build up, slow but sure.

That's it.

I'm not using google to search. Not anymore. Because I know what I am looking for, and I know that most of the time, I'll find a content farm's produce. Now I turn to social sites and functionalities, like many of us.

Some are ranting about it, and I understand, since irrelevant content based of volume has become a real problem for the users.
But hey. The web is its own echosystem, and its parasites will soon be overcome. Users will soon be aware of the little "comment", "remove" and "promote" buttons integrated to their search result, and google is gonna turn social, since I've never seen it yet embrace a technology without wanting to use it for itlself.

That's how the web goes: chaos, organized chaos, order, new kind of chaos and so on...

But maybe I'm wrong. Wait and see...


Technorati Tags: , ,


Google Real-Time Search, Trends and Bad Timing, Lose Your Money for Free.

Yes, Google Real-Time Search is a ground breaking milestone in the online and social media marketing field.
Yes Google Real-Time Search will allow you, online marketers, to address a user as soon as he opens his virtual mouth.
And yes, if it goes wrong, you'll waste a cartload of money.

Let me explain.

There are two things that haven't changed since business is business, and to my mind will gain importance as the potential buyer is getting increasingly well informed: the sales funnel, and the trends.

The buying cycle can be grossly resumed to:

  1. Attention
  2. Interest
  3. Conviction
  4. Desire
  5. Close
Real-Time Search (I'll call it RTS), could be used to influence the buyer at the following levels
  • Attention: I want blue shoes, I tweet it and directly I get the add about it.
  • Interest: I want blue shoes, and I see the community has got the world about it as well, it might be worth a try.

Of course, after the closing step, it's always a good idea to see the users' feedback and collect their busy little minds to improve products and services.

Here there is seemingly no problems. Except that now everybody is going to know everything about everybody else at anytime, comes the problem of the trends.
You probably remember, and still see every year, the nasty 'uber toy of this summer', launched via an avalanche of tv commercials and probably mass mind control from Soviet Russia.
Well some people don't buy them. They see it, giggle, hesitate and then... walk away from it.

Other example, the movie 2012. Every single facebook friend of mine was aching to see the movie, and every single one got so desappointed they asked for their money back.

In the summer toy case, you will confront yourself to a mass of people thinking "Yes, mmm, Bwahaha...no".
In the 2012 case, a single huge mass of user will violently switch from "YEAH MOAR!!" to "Meh...regrets..."

In both case, knowing beforehand what they plan to do at the moment they express their plan will not really be useful. You won't attract more 2012 audience, and you won't get to sell more summer toys.
What you could do though, is spend some more of this buget too fast, producing merchandizing or increasing your tv adds... for nothing, and switching your focus and efforts on something useless.
In short, a trend needs time to develop, and turn a fail fad into a new hotness.

I wouldn't get into RTS marketing without keeping in mind that sometimes, timing is about waiting.


So, yeah...wait and see :D


Technorati Tags: , , ,


A Possible Future for Social Media

The news is official, Friendster is gonna be sold to an e-commerce Malaysian giant.

It might be a good moment to try taking a glimpse into the future of networking websites and social media.

I remember the web panorama when I just began browsing, I was only 15 at the time, and slowly crawling through my 56k modem. It was in 1998.
By the time, online services wars were already raging, like before them OS wars and micro-computers wars.

Things have evolved as you know, and as the hardware/software industry rapidly sieved the lesser actors to leave only a happy and rich few, the online tide is ebbing to leave only a handfull of services ashore.
By experience and memory, ISPs, Search engines, e-commerce websites have all followed a similar pattern:
  1. A new opening is found for a service
  2. The way is lead by an early bird
  3. Clones and colateral services are created
  4. One of them surpasses the early bird and take the lead
  5. The lesser clones disappears, leaving only the strongest/richest
Applying it to the search engine market will leave us with Google, Yahoo and Bing as the strong leaders, and I can remember defunct local contenders such as (in France) Voila, Lycos, plus a cartload of more or less shifty webcrawlers.
Back to social media, we are now pretty much in a phase englobing 3 and 4 in the sectors of content sharing (digg, delicious) and Social Networking (Facebook, Tagged, Hi5, Friendster and so on), leaving the IOBS (Instant Online Blurting Websites) pretty much in the hands of Twitter (the early bird, so to speak).

Following the pattern above, what could be the Social Media forecast for the year to come?

  • Twitter clones, localized or not, will appear, and maybe outsmart it
  • Early birds social networking websites will disappear (I'm thinking MySpace for a safe bet) , leaving Facebook as a leader, while others like Hi5 and Tagged will either find a strong local rooting or slowly weaken
  • Serious sieving of content sharing websites will begin, delicious and digg as leaders

Other changes I can see happening pretty fast:

  • Web portals might re-emerge in force, especially mashups and localized services
  • Not so surprising alliances are going to form, I 'm thinking twitter-facebook-google

Wait and see...



Real-Time Search, Goggles and Public DNS, Google turns into an ubiquitous monster.

I don't even know if I'm being excessive about it.

Approximately a year ago I wrote About:Crome... Is there a plan behind the plan ?
And you know what, I was right.
Now I am looking, at the huge panel of products and services offered by the monster search engine and I can't help myself wondering what is exactly the plan after the plan behind the plan...

Here what Google mainly offers.
  • Search engine
  • Mail
  • Documents
  • Maps
  • Apps and code repository
  • Chat
  • Conference
  • Public DNS
  • Real Time Search
  • Google Goggle
  • Browser
  • Os
These being just a fragment of the whole, there is already a picture slowly forming in my mind: an online all knowing leviathan, gently shaking the Laplace Demon by the heels while engulfing and repeating a tsunami of uninterrupted data.
At this point, not only Google but any barely tenacious web user can get to know who you are, where you are, what you are looking at and what you are thinking at an hourly rate.
Google, nonetheless, reserves itself the right to know where you are going to and where you are from, soon both online and IRL.

The scary would stop there, but a quick look around the web tells me more; this is from the Google Blog:
One far-fetched idea: how about a wearable device that does searches in the background based on the words it picks up from conversations, and then flashes relevant facts?
[...]
Further, why should a search be words at all? Why can’t I enter my query as a picture of the birds overhead and have the search engine identify what kind of bird it is?
[...]
The basic concept is – if the answer exists online anywhere in any language, we’ll go get it for you, translate it and bring it back in your native tongue.

Google wants it all. All the information, about everything, right when you need it.
As a Google user, who uses their products on a daily basis, I find the initiative really grand; Why not salute the tentative to reach instant and complete knowledge for everyone?
As me, I can't help wondering what will happen if Google collapses once it's on the top, or if it turn evil.
I remember myself saying some years ago that cell phone would be a great idea to start a world domination scheme, but not complete until you get them linked to the internet, and internet in every home. Now all the flow is being channeled toward one product... and yes, without turning total conspiracy freak, I can say it bothers me.
With great knowledge comes great power and with great power comes great responsibility.


Wait and see...

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Smallish, Small, Smaller. Optimize your netbook

That's it, I am going to talk about it over and over and over again. Until I probably break the little evil thing: I got myself a netbook.

We are far from the specs of an Eee-pc, I mean by that far above. Well except the battery life, which is far beneath.
Now, my working environment, I mean in the office, is Windows based. I would love to share the linuxian adventures of the lost expat, but that will be for another time, when I actually benefit from ingesting hundreds of man pages to run Firefox.

For now, I would like to share some easy tricks to not fall into the Pit Of Teh Bad Usars who illegally pirate our software while neglecting the marvelous work of O-so-many open source developers.

This post is the first of a couple that will guide you into the tweaking and optimization of small / slow lap resting devices.
Notice that these advices won't just allow you to save some space, but can also make you work much, much faster (works for me).

1) Get rid of Vista

Enough said, let's get serious.

2) Make it practical

Yes, I say it as I think it, it's not because it's small that it needs to look bloated.
You have purchased a little device, with a cramped keyboard, no need to cramp the display as well.

Since you probably do not have the graphic power that goes with a top notch NVidia GPU, you cannot afford to install, for instance, Kubuntu, and the superb all flowing, all spinning effects that go with KDE.

Either your laptop is too slow to allow you the install of any extra software and you can simply hide (most of the time) the task bar, either you have some extra memory and some solutions are available to make you desktop look good, which is a plus.


Getting rid of the Task Bar.

Windows tends to get a firm grasp on its awefull, non tweakable, non resizable task bar occupying some needed bottom-pixels. We will have to find a replacement for the task manager (the little squares with the app names on it), the start button, the quick launch icons and the system tray (little icons on the right).



What you actually don't need:

  • The start button (Squashed by the "win" key):

On 99% of the keyboards I have seen, just next to the "alt" key, you can find the "win" key, which will call the Windows start menu from mostly everywhere.
Faster, easier, you don't even need to move your mouse.

  • The Task Manager (Owned by "alt+tab"):

You actually don't need that. You could think seeing your opened applications on the bottom of your screen is useful, but do you really juggle between THAT much apps? Oh, and I forget, if you have a netbook, you won't be able to anyway, these babies are not really famous for their processing power.
A very handy keyboard shortcut, "alt+tab" (tab being the key just above capslock) will allow you to switch between applications.

  • The Quick Launch shortcuts (Pwned by you!)

Launching quickly an application with Windows XP without over loading your desktop can become a terrible pain if you don't know the following trick:
Go to c:\windows\system32 and place there a shortcut to your favorite applications.
Press "win"+ r , type in the name of one of the shortcuts you just made. O joy, the application starts!
This trick is even more useful when you know that some applications such as Mozilla Firefox don't even need the shortcut to be created beforehand.

If you have followed me until now, you can now right click on you task bar, take a look at its properties, and realize that yes, you can actually hide it and forget about with.
Almost.
Here comes the troublemaker.

The system tray (nasty little rogue)

Well... you just don't need it. You would try accessing it to meddle with the sound settings, but when you can do it with the keyboard shortcuts provided directly on your keyboard.
Nonetheless, some mischievous applications such as YM! our the most dreaded Outlook tend to squat the lot, and you will need to invoke your task bar every now and then in order to find them back.

In the neat future I will tell you how to definitely replace it while adding some eye-candy to the geek-ism, stay tuned.

Re Introduction

Well, here it is.

Finally I have done what I was waiting to do for quite a long time. I got myself a Netbook. Well, or something similar.
I have had many things in my mind, there has been many things I have been wanting to discuss, but all is now lost in the hectic days of work, the come backs from my work at impossible hours and the sleepless nights of sunless Jakarta.

Back on tracks, though, and I should be writing a book before the end of the year.

But writing a book is not that simple, you need focus, you need training and you need a topic that won't make your potential readers run screaming in the opposite direction.

And what with all these random bits of code running through my head every now and now. That too, I have to practice, that too I have to improve, in quite a vital way, lest I see myself in the street in the months to come.

It is said that only the bad worker ever complains about his tools. I deeply disagree.
I do have a computer, a good one, that can be turned into pretty much everything from a virtual machines headquarter to a graphic editing beast.
I just don't have table to put it on. My back does not approve, my back is outraged.

Well, I think that's enough said about me for now, I will go back to my usual ranting of old. And blabber about probably much more than the usual, practice requirement.